PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall73/ 100Good
TomTom Runner GPS Watch

TomTom · Waterproof Fitness Trackers & Cases

TomTom Runner GPS Watch

Excellent

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Verdict · BuyPlastic sports watch with silicone band poses minimal established chemical hazards; no coating toxins identified, typical category safety profile.

The product information we reviewed describes plastic casing, silicone band, electronic components, with no water-repellent coating named. Water resistance on products like this usually comes from the material and its seals rather than a surface treatment. The brand has published no PFAS statement for it.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Plastic casing, silicone band, electronic components

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What TomTom Runner GPS Watch is made of, ingredients and materials

The TomTom Runner uses a rigid plastic casing (likely ABS or polycarbonate) with a replaceable silicone band and electronic internals sealed against moisture. Neither plastic nor medical-grade silicone bands are known to leach BPA, phthalates, or other endocrine disruptors under normal wrist-wear conditions, since they remain at skin temperature and avoid food contact. The sealed design means no coating degradation risk, the waterproofing (typically IP67 or similar) comes from gaskets and material barriers, not surface treatments.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⏳

Silicone band degradation and skin irritation

Medical-grade silicone is durable, but extended UV exposure or sweat-salt accumulation can cause minor surface breakdown; this is cosmetic rather than chemical toxicity, but may trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals.

70/ 100
⚠️

Plastic case thermal instability

ABS and polycarbonate can soften above 60°C, potentially releasing trace styrene or BPA precursors, though wrist-wear use in typical climates poses negligible risk; concern arises only if device is left in direct heat (car dashboards, saunas).

70/ 100
⚠️

Battery leakage from sealed compartment

If the device is damaged and internal batteries crack, alkaline or lithium cells can leak corrosive electrolytes, but this is a mechanical failure risk, not a material chemistry hazard of the intact product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

RoHS compliance is standard for consumer electronics sold in the EU and US, which restricts lead and cadmium in solder; TomTom products are sold in these markets, so compliance is presumed, but no explicit certification statement is published.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Microplastic shedding from silicone band wear

High-quality silicone bands do not shed microplastics under normal friction; this is not a documented concern for fitness watch bands in the literature.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

TomTom has not published a public PFAS or chemical-use policy, and the brand maintains silence on material sourcing and restricted substances. The company has no documented major consumer product safety recalls involving chemical leaching or material failure in fitness trackers. Without independent certification (RoHS, REACH compliance statements) or third-party testing visible in public records, the absence of reported problems suggests adequate manufacturing standards, but transparency is limited.

How it compares in its category

Fitness watch casings across major brands (Garmin, Apple, Fitbit) are similarly plastic-based with silicone bands, all carrying comparable chemical safety profiles. The TomTom Runner sits in the mid-range; it lacks the aluminum chassis of premium alternatives (which can oxidize but do not pose chemical hazards) but avoids softer thermoplastic polyurethane bands, which can occasionally off-gas in very high heat. Overall, it is representative of typical category safety, with no standout advantage or disadvantage.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged exposure to direct sunlight or temperatures above 50°C, as plastics can soften and silicone can degrade over time, though not from leaching. Replace the silicone band if it shows visible cracking, discoloration, or a chemical smell, as breakdown may allow skin irritation. Clean the band with mild soap and water; do not use solvents or aggressive cleaners. The device itself requires no special maintenance beyond keeping seals dry and replacing batteries when needed.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
TomTom has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof fitness trackers & cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.