PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Camino Carryall 35 YETI

Yeti · Waterproof Bags & Luggage

Camino Carryall 35 YETI

Poor

water-repellent coating finish on record with no PFAS disclosure from brand.

Verdict · SkipDurable bag with undisclosed PFAS in water-repellent coating finish and potential polyester hazards; acceptable with informed use and maintenance awareness.

The Camino Carryall 35 has a water-repellent coating finish applied to its nylon or polyester blend. YETI has no PFAS statement on record for this product. water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

The better-graded swap

Salomon Extended Totebag

Salomon

Salomon Extended Totebag

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon or polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

YETI does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Legacy PFAS compounds remain common in outdoor gear; fluorine-free alternatives exist but are not confirmed in this product.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Polyester or nylon degradation and microfiber shedding

Repeated flexing, abrasion, and washing of synthetic blend fabrics can generate microfiber fragments; outdoor bags are prone to pilling and surface wear over time. This is an established concern with synthetic textiles generally, not specific to YETI's formulation.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes or mordants in fabric dyeing

No public reports of problematic dye chemistry in YETI soft goods. However, the brand does not publish dyeing or mordant disclosures, so baseline risk cannot be ruled out for synthetic blends dyed to dark or saturated colors.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or complaints on record for formaldehyde off-gassing from YETI bags. Industrial-grade nylon blends used in outdoor gear typically undergo less aggressive resin treatment than apparel textiles, reducing this risk.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

YETI bags use embroidered logos and anodized aluminum or stainless steel zippers and fasteners. No cadmium, lead, or nickel contamination has been reported in available product literature or complaints.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Camino Carryall 35 uses a nylon or polyester blend fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. This blend is common in outdoor gear because it offers strength, abrasion resistance, and water shedding. The water-repellent coating is where chemical risk concentrates, YETI does not publicly disclose whether their water-repellent coating uses legacy PFAS (like PFOA) or newer fluorine-free alternatives, leaving composition opaque to consumers.

The brand's record and disclosure

YETI maintains silence on PFAS use in its product lines and does not publish material safety data sheets or certifications for water-repellent coating treatments. The brand has not faced major public recalls tied to chemical leaching or off-gassing. YETI's lack of transparency on this issue is common in outdoor gear but stands in contrast to growing industry standards (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx) that disclose water-repellent coating chemistry or commit to PFAS phase-out timelines.

How it compares in its category

Hard-sided coolers dominate YETI's reputation, but soft bags like this Carryall sit in a less-scrutinized product tier. Competitor soft bags (e.g., Osprey, The North Face) vary widely in water-repellent coating disclosure; some now specify fluorine-free coatings. YETI's refusal to disclose water-repellent coating ingredients is a weak point relative to transparency-leading brands, though the bag's durability reputation remains strong in real-world testing.

If you buy it

Use the bag as intended for dry goods and gear transport; avoid prolonged contact with food or drinking water if PFAS concern is high. Wash by hand with mild soap and air dry to minimize any potential leaching of surface treatments into the environment. Do not machine wash, dry clean, or expose to high heat, which could degrade the water-repellent coating and release embedded chemicals. Replace or reseal the bag if the water-repellent finish visibly breaks down (water beading stops or coating peels).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Yeti has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Bags & Luggage

Kelty Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag

Kelty

Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag

Polyester webbing and nylon

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade69Good
🎨

Azo dyes in polyester webbing

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive and seam-tape volatiles (VOC)

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from webbing degradation

Limited concern

70

Standard duffel bag, low PFAS risk but no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Granite Gear ToughSack Assorted Colors

Granite Gear

ToughSack Assorted Colors

Cordura nylon fabric

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Durable nylon pack without water treatment applied.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Salomon Extended Totebag

Salomon

Extended Totebag

polyester/nylon tote fabric, standard construction

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony trioxide in polyester

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Moderate concern

45
💨

VOC off-gassing from dyes and finishes

Limited concern

70

Standard tote with lower PFAS risk but no brand confirmation.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof bags & luggage grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.