Promaster Review, Is Promaster Non-Toxic?
Across 1 graded product, Promaster averages Good (50/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
Promaster
Pure Light Protection Filter
Optical glass with protective coatings
Lead
Optical filters typically use metallic oxides in multilayer coatings to control…
Glass dust from breakage
If dropped and shattered, the filter will produce fine glass particles. Inhalation of…
Fluorinated compounds in coatings (Teflon-family coating, Teflon-type coating analogues)
Some optical manufacturers use fluorinated coatings to improve durability and…
Unknown coatings. Brand says nothing about PFAS.
⚠Undisclosed proprietary coating
Promaster and PFAS, common questions
- Does Promaster have PFAS?
- We graded 1 Promaster product, averaging Good (50/100). None grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
- Is Promaster non-toxic?
- No Promaster product we graded reaches Good. The best of them is Promaster Pure Light Protection Filter at 50/100.
- Which Promaster products should I avoid?
- The lowest-graded Promaster products we have scored are Promaster Pure Light Protection Filter. Each one links to the evidence behind its grade.
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →