Which brands admit their products contain PFAS, and what the rest have published

We researched 108 major brands by hand, against their own pages, state disclosures, independent tests and court records. This is what each one has actually published about PFAS, in one line, with the sources on its brand page.

The brands most open about PFAS in their products are some of the biggest names in cookware. All-Clad, T-fal, Farberware, Made In and others list PTFE and related compounds in their nonstick, many of them in the disclosures California’s cookware law requires. Being on that list means a brand told you. It does not make it the worst choice.

Say some of their products contain PFAS (13)

These brands tell you in their own words, usually in a state disclosure, that some of what they sell contains PFAS. Most also sell lines without it, and each brand page says which.

  • All-CladPFAS legal action on record

    Says its nonstick cookware contains PFAS, naming PTFE, PFA and FEP. Its uncoated cookware is not covered.

  • AnolonPFAS legal action on record

    Its California disclosure says its hard anodized nonstick contains intentionally added PFAS for its nonstick properties.

  • Its own US product page for one eyeshadow pencil lists a PFAS ingredient, and an EU alert reported a matching eyeliner withdrawn in 2024.

  • Its California disclosure lists PTFE, recorded as PFAS, in its air fryer pot, rack and dip tray, and in several other appliances.

  • Its California disclosure says its Premier Professional cookware contains intentionally added PFAS for its nonstick properties.

  • Its own disclosures list PTFE, FEP and PFA in its traditional nonstick, while its Vibrance ceramic line is marketed as made without PFAS.

  • Says its Toughened Non-stick PRO line contains PFAS, and its Essential Non-stick Ceramic line is made without it.

  • Discloses PTFE, FEP and PFA in its Non Stick line under California law, and does not extend a PFAS-free claim to that line.

  • Lists PTFE on its air fryers made before August 2024 and in its NeverStick cookware, and no PTFE on later air fryers or its ceramic lines.

  • Lists PTFE in its Non-Stick Pro bakeware and PFAS in several cookware and utensil lines, while its ceramic bakeware lists only aluminum.

  • T-falPFAS legal action on record

    Says plainly that its nonstick contains PTFE, and lists 26 cookware ranges as not sold in Minnesota because of it.

  • TramontinaPFAS legal action on record

    Describes its traditional nonstick as PTFE-based, and its ceramic nonstick as made without intentionally added PFAS.

  • WD-40 says some specialist products used PTFE, a PFAS, and it is reformulating affected products to remove it.

Publish a position against using PFAS (22)

Each of these is the brand’s own claim, not our finding. Where independent testing or a court record complicates the claim, the brand page says so.

  • Adidas says it is committed to being more than 99% PFAS-free and restricts PFAS in its policy.

  • Its materials guideline allows no perfluorinated compounds, with its switch to PFAS-free materials described as underway in 2023.

  • bareMineralsPFAS legal action on record

    Says on its UK help centre that it no longer makes products with intentionally added PFAS. Organic fluorine was found in one of its mascaras.

  • Burt’s BeesPFAS legal action on record

    Told CBC Marketplace it does not use PFAS. A broader fluorine screen found fluorine in 5 of 7 of its makeup products.

  • CarawayPFAS legal action on record

    Says its ceramic nonstick is made without PFAS and publishes lab testing. The ad industry regulator found a reasonable basis for its PFAS-free claim.

  • Columbia says its PFAS phase-out was completed for all products at the end of 2024, after a 2022 F grade from NRDC and PIRG.

  • GreenPanPFAS legal action on record

    Says its Thermolon ceramic nonstick is free of PFAS, and independent testing found a silicon based coating consistent with that.

  • KotexPFAS legal action on record

    Kimberly-Clark says it does not use PFAS in any of its U.S. consumer products, and one U by Kotex tampon had no organic fluorine in a Mamavation test.

  • Says its cast iron has always been made without PFAS and that third-party labs verify it. We did not find the lab reports published.

  • LululemonPFAS legal action on record

    Says it phased PFAS out in its 2023 fiscal year and limits all PFAS to 50 ppm. One pair of Align pants measured 32 ppm fluorine in independent testing.

  • MACPFAS legal action on record

    Told CBC Marketplace it does not intentionally add PFAS. CBC’s own lab tests found PFAS in two MAC products.

  • NikePFAS legal action on record

    Nike says it completed its PFAS conversion, while a 2023 Prop 65 suit alleged PFAS in a Jordan duffle bag and a 2022 scorecard flagged membrane gaps.

  • Says it has never used PFAS in any of its products and never will. We found no independent test.

  • Says its products are made without intentionally added PFAS and that its suppliers follow the AFIRM restricted substances list.

  • Patagonia says all new styles from Winter 2025 are made without intentionally added PFAS.

  • Says on its UK site that it has removed PFAS from its entire range. We could not find the same statement on the US site.

  • SamsungPFAS legal action on record

    Samsung says it is working toward PFAS-free status and lists PFAS as non-use for mobile products from May 2026, while a watch band lawsuit was dismissed in 2025.

  • ScotchgardPFAS legal action on record

    Its maker 3M says it completed its exit from PFAS manufacturing at the end of 2025, after decades of PFAS chemistry in the brand.

  • Publicly backs PFAS restrictions and told Minnesota lawmakers it supported the state’s ban. Independent testing of its products is mixed.

  • ThinxPFAS legal action on record

    Under a class action settlement, requires its suppliers to attest that PFAS is not intentionally added to its period underwear.

  • Parent Kimberly-Clark says it does not use PFAS in any U.S. consumer products, and U by Kotex Click tampons showed no organic fluorine in a Mamavation test.

  • The brand says it never intentionally adds PFAS and tests for it, while acknowledging trace organic fluorine in its own testing.

The answer depends on the product line (23)

These brands make PFAS claims for some products and not others, or sell more than one kind of coating, so the only useful answer is about the exact line you are buying.

  • Says a lab found its reverse osmosis system reduced 20 PFAS below detection, with no equivalent test for its pitcher filters.

  • Arc'teryx says the majority of its products are now PFAS-compliant and the rest are still transitioning.

  • Sells hard anodized PTFE nonstick and ceramic nonstick, confirmed by independent testing. We could not load its own disclosure page.

  • A Coleman representative says most products on its website are now PFAS-free, and a PFAS version of one tent was still sold elsewhere.

  • Sells PTFE nonstick and PTFE-free ceramic lines, both confirmed by independent testing. We could not load its own disclosure pages.

  • Labels some products as made with PFAS-free fabric, with no company-wide PFAS policy we could find.

  • Says its scrubs use a PFAS-free finish, with no PFAS policy covering its leggings or other activewear.

  • P&G told Consumer Reports its Glide Pro-Health floss contains PTFE, and Oral-B now says Glide no longer uses PTFE, not yet independently verified.

  • Says it is phasing PFAS out, with its workwear depending on PFAS for longer than its sports apparel.

  • HexCladPFAS legal action on record

    Says its newer TerraBond coating is PFAS-free, after settling a class action over marketing PTFE-coated pans as free of PFAS.

  • KitchenAidPFAS legal action on record

    KitchenAid says its cookware is PFOA-free and its bakeware is PTFE and PFOA free.

  • Holds PFAS reduction certifications on specific filters, and describes others as tested rather than certified.

  • Calls some of its rain gear PFC-free, with no statement that its whole range is PFAS-free.

  • Markets some air fryer coatings as PFAS-free without naming the material, and lists PTFE in a rice cooker pot.

  • Says the coating on its Naturals nonstick bakeware is made without PFAS, with no equivalent claim for its other lines.

  • Oral-BPFAS legal action on record

    P&G told Consumer Reports its Glide Pro-Health floss contains PTFE, and Oral-B now says Glide no longer uses PTFE, not yet independently verified.

  • Says its Titanium Always Pan Pro has no coating at all. Consumer Reports found none of 96 PFAS in its ceramic Always Pan in 2022.

  • Says its Micro Mint floss is made without PTFE, and does not say what its other flossers are made from.

  • Says its finishes are PFC-free or free of PFCs of environmental concern, which is not the same as free of all of them.

  • Calls one newer Australian air fryer PFAS-free, and does not say what coats the UK and European models.

  • Salomon says its footwear and bags are PFC free and that it is phasing PFAS out of the rest of the range.

  • Says its Americoat silicone coating is PFAS free. We found no independent test confirming it.

  • Says its pitcher lining has no intentionally added PFAS and that long-chain PFAS left its production in 2021.

We found no PFAS statement (50)

We looked for a PFAS statement from each of these brands and did not find one. That is our research, not proof a brand has never said anything, and a missing statement is not evidence of harm.

  • AlwaysPFAS legal action on record

    We found no PFAS statement from Always or owner P&G; a 2026 California lawsuit alleges PFAS in its pads.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Amazon Basics; Amazon restricts PFAS only in some Amazon Kitchen food contact items.

  • Its FAQ lists what its products are free of, and PFAS is not on it.

  • We found no PFAS statement. An archived page of its own listed a PFAS ingredient in one concealer.

  • Its chemical disclosure covers its Smart Oven Air Fryer Pro and does not mention PTFE or PFAS.

  • We found no PFAS statement. The ingredient list for its mineral sunscreen contains no fluorinated ingredient.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Chanel, and no lab test or lawsuit naming it.

  • CliniquePFAS legal action on record

    No policy of its own, but covered by a 2022 court-enforceable settlement on intentionally added PFOA in cosmetics.

  • ColgatePFAS legal action on record

    We found no PFAS statement from Colgate, while independent floss testing found organic fluorine in Colgate Total floss.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Contigo.

  • Publishes a general explainer on PFAS-free claims, and does not say what coats its own air fryer baskets.

  • Côte lists the toxins its polish is free from, PFAS is not named, and we found no PFAS statement.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Crep Protect on its own pages.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Crest, and no PFAS test or suit naming its toothpaste, only a floss sold under the Crest Glide name was screened.

  • We found no statement on PFAS in its products, but Culligan says its filters are certified to reduce Total PFAS in water.

  • We found no PFAS policy from Dove or Unilever. The one independent test we found came back non-detect.

  • Its avoided-ingredient lists do not include PFAS, and one current product lists a PFAS ingredient.

  • Pledged in 2023 to remove PFAS by spring 2024. We found no public confirmation that it did, and no mention of PFAS on its own pages.

  • Estée LauderPFAS legal action on record

    No policy of its own, but bound by a 2022 court-enforceable settlement on intentionally added PFOA, which is not every PFAS.

  • Its published ingredient commitments cover microplastics at length and do not mention PFAS.

  • Its ingredient listing names soap ingredients and no fluorinated ingredient, with no PFAS statement.

  • We found no PFAS statement on Fenty Beauty pages, and no lab test or lawsuit naming it.

  • No policy of its own. Its parent Google says it limits PFAS in its products.

  • Its sustainability pages do not mention PFAS or any restricted substances.

  • Parent P&G’s only PFAS statement covers menstrual products, not shampoo.

  • We found no PFAS policy, and could not locate on its own channels a no-PFAS statement a magazine attributed to it in 2024.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Kiwi.

  • KnixPFAS legal action on record

    Agreed in a class action settlement to remove references to its products being PFAS free from its website.

  • MaybellinePFAS legal action on record

    Parent L’Oréal says it stopped making formulas with PFAS by the end of 2025, without naming Maybelline.

  • We found no PFAS statement. An archived ingredient list for one of its stain removers contains no fluorinated ingredient.

  • Does not name its air fryer coating. Sister brand T-fal’s PTFE disclosure does not cover Moulinex products.

  • We found no PFAS statement from NARS.

  • We found no PFAS policy from Neutrogena or its parent Kenvue.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Owala, only BPA and phthalate free claims about its plastics.

  • Its ingredient disclosure for one stain remover lists no fluorinated ingredient, with no PFAS statement.

  • PlaytexPFAS legal action on record

    We found no PFAS statement from Playtex, Sport tampons had 19 ppm organic fluorine in a Mamavation test, and a Playtex PFAS class action was dismissed in 2024.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Pottery Barn, and one independent swatch test found fluorine in a performance fabric.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Reebok. One pair of Reebok tights tested non-detect for total fluorine in a Mamavation lab test.

  • RevlonPFAS legal action on record

    We found no PFAS statement from Revlon. A 2022 lawsuit alleged PFAS in Almay makeup, and Revlon's 2014 chemical list named PTFE.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Reynolds; Mamavation found 14 ppm fluorine in its parchment and none detected in its non-stick foil.

  • Stanley says third party labs check its products against rules including PFOS, but we found no wider PFAS policy.

  • TampaxPFAS legal action on record

    We found no PFAS statement from Tampax, one Tampax tampon had 23 ppm organic fluorine in a Mamavation test, and a PFAS class action was dismissed in 2025.

  • Says it refuses over 200 ingredients, with no published PFAS statement among them.

  • We did not retrieve a PFAS statement from The North Face's own pages, though press reports say parent VF committed to phase PFAS out.

  • Now a licensed name, and nobody behind it publishes anything about PFAS that we could find.

  • Its page for its Cerastone coating does not mention PFAS, PTFE or PFOA.

  • Lists the irritants its products are free of, and PFAS is not on the list.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Waterdrop about its own materials. It markets some systems as reducing PFOS and PFOA in tap water.

  • We found no PFAS statement from West Elm. Mamavation found a PFAS marker in one sofa swatch and none in two others.

  • We found no PFAS statement from Williams Sonoma, only a page linking to cookware brands' own disclosures.

How to read this

Every line records what a brand has said, not what its products contain. A brand’s claim is its claim, and several are complicated by independent testing, which the brand page sets out.

“We found no PFAS statement” means we looked and did not find one. It is not proof a brand has never said anything, and it is not evidence of harm.

27 brands are marked with PFAS legal action on record, meaning a lawsuit, settlement or attorney general action about PFAS names them. Several of those cases were dismissed or settled without any admission, and the brand page says which.

Sources last opened 2026-10-01. Every point is linked on the brand’s own page. Free to cite with attribution to “PFAS Authority (pfasauthority.com)” and a link.