Ruby Love Review, Is Ruby Love Non-Toxic?
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Across 2 graded products, Ruby Love averages Poor (48/100). On disclosure, the brand holds third-party PFAS-free verification. 1 of its products grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.
Worth buying from Ruby Love Good or better, safest first
Ruby Love
Women's Ruby Love Period Underwear Hipster
organic cotton with water-resistant treatment
Coating degradation and microplastic shedding over time
Water-resistant coatings on any textile can degrade with repeated washing and wear…
Lower PFAS concern. Third-party certified PFAS-free absorbent underwear.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
Ruby Love
Maximum Protection Period Underwear Bundle 10 Pieces Mix & Match
Cotton/nylon blend with waterproof coating
PFAS
Waterproofing agents in textiles can include polyurethane, silicones, or other…
Microfiber shedding from nylon-coating interface
Nylon-coated textiles can shed microfibers during washing, particularly if the coating…
Skin irritation from coating materials or residues
Direct contact of a waterproof coating with sensitive vulvar skin over extended wear (12+…
Waterproof period underwear; PFAS risk unknown, brand silent on treatment.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →