54Good

Does Trilene fishing line have PFAS?

The verdict
Trilene fishing line averages 54 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Trilene fishing line products graded as of October 2026, below the 75 out of 100 median for the 13 other fishing line brands graded alongside it.
Free to quote with attribution to PFAS Authority and a link to pfasauthority.com/brands/trilene/fishing-line.

Trilene fishing line averages Good on our four-band scale. 1 of the 4 we graded is worth buying. That is above 15% of the fishing line brands we grade.

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Trilene fishing line worth buying Good or better, best-graded first

  • Nylon monofilament fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Nylon degradation and microplastic shedding, UV exposure and mechanical wear can cause nylon monofilament to…

Which Trilene fishing line contains PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

  • Monofilament nylon (coated, unspecified treatment)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • PFAS. Low-visibility monofilament coatings commonly use Teflon-family coating or fluorinated additives in the…

5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • monofilament nylon with undisclosed water-resistant coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • PFAS. The proprietary coating on Trilene Big Game is undisclosed. Historical precedent and market silence…

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line with fluorescent coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fluorescent coating composition (unconfirmed additives). The fluorescent brightener applied to this product…

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

Better fishing line from other brands

Graded higher than the Trilene average of 54.

Ande Monofilament

Ande

Monofilament

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microplastic shedding during use
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microplastic fragmentation
Ande Premium Green 1/4 Spool

Ande

Premium Green 1/4 Spool

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • UV degradation and polymer brittleness

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

The same question, asked of the other fishing line brands

Best average grade first. Trilene averages 54.

See every Trilene product we grade on the Trilene brand page, or the full fishing line ranking.