PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall4/ 100Bad
Trilene Fishing Line Xt 12lb Green Low Visibility

Trilene · Fishing Line

Trilene Fishing Line Xt 12lb Green Low Visibility

Good

Skip unless coating composition is verified with manufacturer.

Verdict · SkipMonofilament nylon fishing line poses low acute chemical hazard when used as intended, but PFAS coating risk and lack of brand transparency warrant cautious purchase with awareness of microplastic shedding.

Monofilament nylon with undisclosed coating composition. No PFAS claims, third-party verification, or coating identity available.

The better-graded swap

Maxima Ultragreen Service Spool

Maxima

Maxima Ultragreen Service Spool

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Monofilament nylon (coated, unspecified treatment)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Trilene Fishing Line Xt Low Visibility is made of, ingredients and materials

Trilene XT is extruded monofilament nylon (likely nylon 6 or nylon 66), a synthetic polymer with an unspecified surface treatment applied to reduce visibility and improve handling. The coating composition is not disclosed by the brand, which is the primary concern, low-visibility fishing lines are often treated with Teflon-family coating, UV absorbers, or other surface coatings that may contain PFAS or other leachable additives. Nylon itself is stable under normal fishing conditions, but the coating degrades over time through abrasion and UV exposure, releasing microparticles into aquatic environments.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Low-visibility monofilament coatings commonly use Teflon-family coating or fluorinated additives in the fishing industry, though Trilene does not disclose this. No public testing of this specific product for PFAS has been located; risk is inferred from industry practice, not confirmed.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding during use and storage

Monofilament nylon sheds microparticles as the coating abrades against guides, knots, and water. Scientific literature documents nylon fishing line as a source of aquatic microplastics; this is a known characteristic of the material class, not specific to Trilene's formulation.

45/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation and leaching

All surface coatings on monofilament degrade under UV and mechanical stress. Without disclosure of coating additives (dyes, UV absorbers, slip agents), leaching potential cannot be fully assessed, but surface treatment breakdown is inevitable over typical fishing line lifespan.

20/ 100
🎨

UV absorber or dye additives (unspecified)

Green-dyed or low-visibility lines often contain azo dyes or aromatic UV absorbers to achieve color and fade resistance. Trilene does not specify these, so additive safety (allergens, heavy metals in pigments) is not publicly verifiable.

70/ 100
⚠️

Entanglement and wildlife harm (non-chemical)

Discarded or lost monofilament fishing line is a well-documented wildlife entanglement hazard. This is not a chemical hazard but a physical persistence issue inherent to nylon; proper disposal is essential.

45/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Trilene (owned by Berkley, a Rapala subsidiary) does not publicly disclose coating formulations, PFAS content, or third-party testing for fishing lines. The brand has no known published environmental or chemical safety certifications for this product line. Industry-wide, fishing line manufacturers rarely volunteer PFAS or coating composition data, and Trilene follows this norm without transparent commitment to phasing out PFAS or disclosing coating composition timelines.

How it compares in its category

Monofilament fishing lines are the dominant and most affordable option; they degrade faster than braided alternatives but are simpler to handle. Trilene XT is a mid-range consumer product without third-party certification (e.g., no eco-label or PFAS-free claims). Comparable brands (Stren, Suffix) offer similarly opaque coating information. Lines marketed explicitly as PFAS-free or with environmental certifications (limited availability) provide better transparency, though cost is higher.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dark place to slow UV degradation and coating breakdown. Replace line annually or when visibility decreases, as degradation releases microparticles. Do not incinerate or flush spent line; place in trash or proper waste stream to prevent aquatic contamination. Wash hands after handling to remove any loose coating particles. Consider switching to a branded PFAS-free or certified monofilament alternative if environmental persistence is a concern for you.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Trilene has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Trilene Fishing Line Xt 12lb Green Low Visibility?

Ande Monofilament

Ande

Monofilament

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microplastic shedding during use
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microplastic fragmentation
Ande Premium Green 1/4 Spool

Ande

Premium Green 1/4 Spool

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • UV degradation and polymer brittleness

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More fishing line grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.