Abena Abri-Form Comfort Plastic-Backed Briefs vs Incontinence Pads: which is safer?
Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. Abena Abri-Form Comfort Plastic-Backed Briefs carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Abri-Form
Abena Abri-Form Comfort Plastic-Backed Briefs
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePFAS in waterproof coating (fluorinated polymer treatment)
PossibleAdhesive or binding chemical leachates
PossiblePlastic breakdown and microparticle release
Our pick
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in waterproof coating (fluorinated polymer treatment), Adhesive or binding chemical leachates and Plastic breakdown and microparticle release on the Abri-Form and not on the Eco By Naty.
- We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Abri-Form.
- The Abri-Form is plastic backing with moisture/wetness barrier where the Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Abri-Form grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking