Abena Abri-San Premium Shaped Incontinence Pad vs Incontinence Pads: which is safer?
Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. Abena Abri-San Premium Shaped Incontinence Pad carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Abri-Form
Abena Abri-San Premium Shaped Incontinence Pad
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleUnspecified waterproof backing coating (PFAS risk category)
ReportedSkin irritation from SAP or adhesive contact
PossibleMicroplastic or particulate shedding
Our pick
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Unspecified waterproof backing coating (PFAS risk category), Skin irritation from SAP or adhesive contact, Microplastic or particulate shedding and Degradation of waterproof backing over storage or repeated washing on the Abri-Form and not on the Eco By Naty.
- We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Abri-Form.
- The Abri-Form is Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, waterproof backing coating unspecified where the Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Abri-Form grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking