Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts vs Men's Athlete Speed Shorts: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Adidas
Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Poor 47/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Woven polyester/nylon blend, no waterproof or stain-resistant treatment specified
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal colorants
ReportedMicrofiber shedding from synthetic blend
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in finishing
Reebok
Men's Athlete Speed Shorts
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Poor 47/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction
Confidence
72%
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in finishing
PossibleAntimony in polyester
ReportedMicroplastic shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal colorants and Microfiber shedding from synthetic blend on the Adidas and not on the Reebok.
- We flag Antimony in polyester and Microplastic shedding on the Reebok and not on the Adidas.
- Both carry a flag for Formaldehyde resins in finishing, so neither choice avoids it.
- The Adidas is Woven polyester/nylon blend, no waterproof or stain-resistant treatment specified where the Reebok is Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof sports gear, see the full ranking