Women's adidas Iconisea Ribbed Padded Thin Straps Swimsuit vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Women's adidas Iconisea Ribbed Padded Thin Straps Swimsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Adidas
Women's adidas Iconisea Ribbed Padded Thin Straps Swimsuit
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments
PossibleAntimony in polyester
PossibleElastic degradation and leachate from polyurethane
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal pigments, Antimony in polyester, Elastic degradation and leachate from polyurethane and Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers on the Adidas and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Adidas.
- The Adidas is Nylon/polyester blend swimsuit fabric with standard elastic where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More swimwear: see the full ranking