PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall49/ 100Poor
Women's adidas Iconisea Ribbed Padded Thin Straps Swimsuit

Adidas · Swimwear

Women's adidas Iconisea Ribbed Padded Thin Straps Swimsuit

Good

Lower concern; standard swimwear without waterproofing or stain treatment.

Verdict · SkipStandard nylon/polyester swimwear with no established chemical hazards; PFAS profile acceptable for non-waterproofed garment; Adidas has no relevant recalls on record.

Ribbed padded suit uses conventional nylon and polyester fabrics without water-repellent or stain-resistant finishing. Adidas has not disclosed PFAS policies or verification.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester blend swimsuit fabric with standard elastic

Lab data

No public lab test

What Women's adidas Iconisea Ribbed Padded is made of, ingredients and materials

This swimsuit is a nylon/polyester blend, the industry standard for competitive and recreational swimwear. Nylon is synthetic polyamide that resists chlorine and saltwater degradation; polyester adds durability and color retention. Neither material inherently leaches chemicals into skin or water under normal swimming conditions. The elastic (likely polyurethane-based) is the component most prone to degradation with age and UV exposure, but this is a mechanical failure, not a toxicological concern.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Conventional swimwear dyes may include azo compounds or trace heavy metals (e.g., chromium, lead in pigments), but regulatory thresholds in the EU and North America limit hazardous azo dyes. No independent testing of this specific product is publicly available; risk is typical for mass-market colored swimwear.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester is often manufactured with antimony trioxide as a catalyst, with residual antimony present in the final fiber at levels typically below 200 ppm. Skin contact with polyester does not cause measurable antimony transfer; this is primarily a manufacturing and end-of-life concern, not a use-phase hazard.

70/ 100
⏳

Elastic degradation and leachate from polyurethane

Elastic components may degrade with prolonged chlorine or UV exposure, potentially releasing oligomers or residual additives. The rate is slow under normal use; risk increases with infrequent rinsing or storage in direct sunlight.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers

Nylon and polyester swimwear shed microfibers during washing and wear. The quantity is typical for synthetic textiles and not unique to this product; environmental impact is cumulative across all synthetic garments, not a direct health hazard to the wearer.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde resin treatment is standard in nylon/polyester swimwear fabrics. Adidas does not advertise formaldehyde-based curing in this product, and no testing or recall documents confirm its presence.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Adidas does not publicly disclose chemical composition or testing of swimwear beyond fiber content. The company has no documented recalls for chemical contamination of swimwear and no certification against formaldehyde resins or azo dyes in this product line. Adidas maintains general sustainability commitments but does not transparently report chemical restrictions specific to swimwear fabrics.

How it compares in its category

Nylon/polyester blends are not linked to the chemical finishes (flame retardants, water-repellent treatments) found in technical outerwear or some performance fabrics. This product sits in the conventional mass-market range with no premium certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, bluesign) but also no indicators of elevated risk. Luxury or eco-focused brands may offer transparent testing, but chemical hazard levels for this type are broadly comparable across price tiers.

If you buy it

Rinse after saltwater or chlorinated swimming to extend elastic life and remove residual chlorine. Wash in cool water, lay flat to dry, and avoid prolonged direct sunlight to slow UV degradation of the polyester dyes. Replace if the elastic loses tension or the seams separate, as these are signs the polymer matrix is breaking down. Normal storage in a dry drawer poses no leaching risk; do not store in direct heat or a sealed plastic bag, as moisture and warmth can accelerate fabric aging.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Adidas has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.