Air Flow Underpads - Heavy Absorbency vs Incontinence Pads: which is safer?
Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. TENA Air Flow Underpads - Heavy Absorbency carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Tena
Air Flow Underpads - Heavy Absorbency
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleWaterproofing agent (unspecified polymer; possible PFAS-based fluorochemical)
PossiblePlastic backing degradation and leaching under heat/moisture
Our pick
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Waterproofing agent (unspecified polymer; possible PFAS-based fluorochemical) and Plastic backing degradation and leaching under heat/moisture on the Tena and not on the Eco By Naty.
- We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Tena.
- The Tena is cellulose core with plastic/synthetic backing layers (waterproofing agent unspecified) where the Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Tena grade, at 42% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking