Monofilament vs Fairplay Floating Fly Fishing Line: which is safer?

Ande Monofilament is the clear pick. Cortland Fairplay Floating Fly Fishing Line carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Ande Monofilament

Ande

Monofilament

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 81/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Monofilament nylon fishing line

Confidence

72%

PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use

Cortland Fairplay Floating Fly Fishing Line

Cortland

Fairplay Floating Fly Fishing Line

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Poor 28/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Floating fly line with unspecified waterproof/buoyancy coating

Confidence

35%

PossibleCoating leachables (non-PFAS)

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from degraded coating

PossibleSkin and eye contact with coating during handling

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Microplastic shedding during use on the Ande and not on the Cortland.
  • We flag Coating leachables (non-PFAS), Microplastic shedding from degraded coating and Skin and eye contact with coating during handling on the Cortland and not on the Ande.
  • The Ande is Monofilament nylon fishing line where the Cortland is Floating fly line with unspecified waterproof/buoyancy coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Ande is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Cortland grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More fishing line, see the full ranking