Monofilament vs Fishing Line Xt 12lb Green Low Visibility: which is safer?
Ande Monofilament is the clear pick. Trilene Fishing Line Xt 12lb Green Low Visibility carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Ande
Monofilament
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use
Trilene
Fishing Line Xt 12lb Green Low Visibility
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleUnspecified coating composition and potential PFAS
ReportedMicroplastic shedding during use and storage
LikelyCoating degradation and leaching
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastic shedding during use on the Ande and not on the Trilene.
- We flag Unspecified coating composition and potential PFAS, Microplastic shedding during use and storage, Coating degradation and leaching and UV absorber or dye additives (unspecified) on the Trilene and not on the Ande.
- The Ande is Monofilament nylon fishing line where the Trilene is Monofilament nylon (coated, unspecified treatment), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Ande is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Trilene grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More fishing line, see the full ranking