USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack vs Rugged MagSafe Case for iPhone 17 Pro: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Anker
USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCopper conductor corrosion and oxidation
PossibleThermal degradation of PVC jacket
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from jacket wear
Beats
Rugged MagSafe Case for iPhone 17 Pro
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleElastomer degradation and microparticle shedding
PossibleThermal leaching from elevated device temperatures
PossibleBacterial growth in sealed waterproof seams
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Copper conductor corrosion and oxidation, Thermal degradation of PVC jacket and Microplastic shedding from jacket wear on the Anker and not on the Beats.
- We flag Elastomer degradation and microparticle shedding, Thermal leaching from elevated device temperatures and Bacterial growth in sealed waterproof seams on the Beats and not on the Anker.
- The Anker is PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors where the Beats is Elastomer/thermoplastic blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Beats grade, at 32% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof personal electronics cases, see the full ranking