Driclor Antiperspirant Unisex Dry Roll-on Deodorant 20 ml vs Baking Soda Free Deodorant: which is safer?

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Driclor Antiperspirant Unisex Dry Roll-on Deodorant 20 ml

Antiperspirant Driclor

Driclor Antiperspirant Unisex Dry Roll-on Deodorant 20 ml

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Aluminum chlorohydrate solution (antiperspirant active), roll-on formulation

Confidence

72%

PossibleAluminum systemic absorption and neurotoxicity

ReportedSkin irritation and contact dermatitis

PossibleMicrobial contamination in roll-on applicator

Our pick

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant

Primally Pure

Baking Soda Free Deodorant

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 96/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSkin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Aluminum systemic absorption and neurotoxicity, Skin irritation and contact dermatitis and Microbial contamination in roll-on applicator on the Antiperspirant Driclor and not on the Primally Pure.
  • We flag Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity on the Primally Pure and not on the Antiperspirant Driclor.
  • The Antiperspirant Driclor is Aluminum chlorohydrate solution (antiperspirant active), roll-on formulation where the Primally Pure is mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Primally Pure is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More deodorant, see the full ranking