ARC-914SBD Digital Rice Cooker vs 12 Cup Rice and Grain Cooker: which is safer?
Instant Pot 12 Cup Rice and Grain Cooker is the clear pick. ARC-914SBD Digital Rice Cooker carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Aroma
ARC-914SBD Digital Rice Cooker
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleNonstick coating thermal degradation and fume risk
PossibleLeaching from degraded coating or underlying substrate
ReportedCoating peeling or flaking into food
Our pick
Instant Pot
12 Cup Rice and Grain Cooker
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleStainless steel corrosion and metal leaching
PossibleSilicone gasket degradation and off-gassing
PossibleBacterial growth in water reservoir or seal cavities
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Nonstick coating thermal degradation and fume risk, Leaching from degraded coating or underlying substrate and Coating peeling or flaking into food on the Aroma and not on the Instant Pot.
- We flag Stainless steel corrosion and metal leaching, Silicone gasket degradation and off-gassing and Bacterial growth in water reservoir or seal cavities on the Instant Pot and not on the Aroma.
- The Aroma is nonstick-coated inner pot, unspecified polymer where the Instant Pot is Stainless steel pot with no nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 40 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Instant Pot is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Aroma grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More rice cookers, see the full ranking