ARC-914SBD Digital Rice Cooker
Unknown nonstick coating; no PFAS disclosure. Consider alternatives with confirmed safe materials.
Aroma does not disclose the nonstick coating composition or PFAS status for this rice cooker. Inner pot material and coating specifics are unavailable from public sources.
The better-graded swap
Zojirushi
Zojirushi Neuro Fuzzy Rice Cooker & Warmer
75/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
nonstick-coated inner pot, unspecified polymer
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What ARC-914SBD Digital Rice Cooker is made of, ingredients and materials
The ARC-914SBD has a nonstick-coated inner pot, but Aroma has not publicly specified the coating chemistry (Teflon-type coating-based, ceramic, silicone, or proprietary). This matters because different nonstick chemistries carry different thermal stability profiles and leaching risks. Without disclosure, you cannot verify whether the coating is free from PFAS precursors or legacy per- and polyfluorinated compounds. The outer housing material is also not detailed in available product information.
What’s concerning
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Nonstick coating thermal degradation and fume risk
If the coating is Teflon-type coating-based (not confirmed), overheating or degraded coating can release polymer fumes. Aroma's silence on coating type prevents assessment of fume temperature threshold for this specific product.
Leaching from degraded coating or underlying substrate
Repeated thermal cycling, scratches, or normal wear can expose the substrate (likely aluminum or steel) beneath the coating. Without material disclosure, you cannot rule out aluminum leaching into rice or water, especially if coating fails.
Coating peeling or flaking into food
User reports on budget nonstick rice cookers, including some Aroma models, describe visible coating degradation within 1-3 years. Ingestion of flaked coating particles is the primary concern, though risk depends on coating adhesion quality.
What’s reassuring
Polymer off-gassing from unspecified plastic housing
No documented off-gassing complaints specific to the ARC-914SBD housing material. Standard food-contact plastic use in rice cookers is unlikely to pose significant VOC concerns under normal operating conditions, but housing material is not detailed.
Heavy metals
No lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination has been reported for Aroma rice cooker pots. Rice cooker ceramics are not typically prone to these contaminants, and Aroma likely meets basic FDA food-contact standards, though this is not independently verified for this model.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Aroma does not maintain a public PFAS transparency policy or detailed material safety disclosures for its cookware lines. No independent certifications (NSF, GREENGUARD, or equivalent) are documented for this model. The brand has not published ingredient lists or third-party testing results for nonstick coatings. This silence is notable in a category where competitors increasingly publish coating composition or pursue non-fluorinated alternatives.
How it compares in its category
Budget rice cookers typically prioritize cost over coating transparency; many use Teflon-type coating or proprietary fluorinated coatings without disclosure. Mid-range alternatives from brands like Zojirushi and Tiger publish more detailed material specs and often offer ceramic or non-Teflon-type coating options. The ARC-914SBD sits in a price-competitive segment where material transparency is less common than in premium cookware, but not unique.
If you buy it
Never exceed normal operating temperatures (the cooker's automatic heat-limit should prevent this, but verify it). Inspect the nonstick coating monthly for chips, peeling, or discoloration; if coating degrades, replace the inner pot or the unit. Avoid metal utensils and abrasive scrubbing; hand wash only. Do not store acidic foods (vinegar, citrus, tomato) in the pot for extended periods, as this may accelerate coating breakdown and leaching of base materials underneath.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Aroma has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to ARC-914SBD Digital Rice Cooker?
- Stainless steel pot with no nonstick coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Stainless steel corrosion and metal leaching
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Stainless steel inner pot and non-coated heating elements
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Mineral and microbial buildup in heating element
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon- Stainless steel inner pot, aluminum outer housing
- Stainless steel nickel content
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More rice cookers grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.