TVS Aroma 9.5" Frying Pan vs Stainless Clad Fry Pan: which is safer?
Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan is the clear pick. TVS Aroma 9.5" Frying Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Aroma
TVS Aroma 9.5" Frying Pan
PFAS grade
Bad 15/100
Overall grade
Bad 7/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Nonstick coating, type unspecified by brand
Confidence
35%
PossibleTeflon-type coating fume inhalation risk
PossibleCoating degradation and ingestion of microparticles
Our pick
Made In
Stainless Clad Fry Pan
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 96/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating
Confidence
90%
PossibleClad separation or delamination over time
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PTFE coating fume inhalation risk and Coating degradation and ingestion of microparticles on the Aroma and not on the Made In.
- We flag Clad separation or delamination over time on the Made In and not on the Aroma.
- The Aroma is Nonstick coating, type unspecified by brand where the Made In is Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Made In is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Aroma grade, at 35% confidence against 90%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cookware, see the full ranking