PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall7/ 100Bad
TVS Aroma 9.5" Frying Pan

Aroma · Cookware

TVS Aroma 9.5" Frying Pan

Bad

Unknown non-stick coating poses the typical PFAS risk.

Verdict · SkipUnspecified nonstick coating raises PFAS uncertainty; no major safety incidents on record, but brand transparency is weak.

TVS Aroma won't disclose what non-stick coating is on this pan. Standard non-stick frying pans carry PFAS risk unless marked Teflon-type coating-free or PFOA-free.

The better-graded swap

Heritage Steel 10.5" Fry Pan with Lid

Heritage Steel

Heritage Steel 10.5" Fry Pan with Lid

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nonstick coating, type unspecified by brand

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

60/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume inhalation risk

If the nonstick coating is Teflon-type coating-based (unconfirmed), overheating above 500F can release fumes. Risk is low under normal cooking use but present if user mishandles high-heat or preheating. Aroma's silence on coating type prevents certainty.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and ingestion of microparticles

Budget nonstick coatings often degrade within 2-3 years of regular use. Flaking or peeling coating particles could enter food, though toxicity of any nonstick residue is not well established. Risk increases with improper care (metal utensils, dishwasher).

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No documented contamination in Aroma cookware. Most US cookware manufacturers test for heavy metals, but TVS Aroma does not publish independent third-party test results. Risk is low if brand follows FDA regulations, but opacity means absence of assurance rather than confirmed safety.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Aluminum leaching from underlying base material

If the pan body is aluminum, intact nonstick coating prevents contact with food. Degraded coating could expose aluminum, but clinical significance of dietary aluminum from cookware is disputed. No specific reports for this brand.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The TVS Aroma 9.5 features a nonstick coating of unspecified chemistry. Aroma has not disclosed whether the coating is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon-type) or newer ceramic/silicone alternatives. This opacity is the primary concern, Teflon-type coating coatings can release fumes at high temperatures (above 500F/260C), while their composition and durability remain proprietary. The pan's base material and enamel finish (if any) are also unidentified in public product information.

The brand's record and disclosure

Aroma Housewares is a US-based cookware manufacturer with no documented safety recalls related to nonstick coating hazards or heavy metal contamination on record. However, the brand provides minimal material transparency on its product pages and does not publish PFAS or coating composition statements. This silence is typical of many budget cookware brands and does not indicate a hazard, but it prevents informed assessment of long-term coating stability or specific PFAS avoidance.

How it compares in its category

Budget nonstick frying pans at this price point almost universally use undisclosed Teflon-type coating or Teflon-type coating-variant coatings. The TVS Aroma 9.5 is not exceptional in this regard. Higher-end alternatives (Le Creuset, All-Clad, GreenPan) offer explicit material certification or ceramic coatings with full ingredient disclosure. Cast iron or stainless steel pans avoid nonstick coating hazards entirely but require different cooking technique and maintenance.

If you buy it

Never heat the pan above medium-high heat (400F/200C) to avoid potential Teflon-type coating fume release. Do not use metal utensils or abrasive scrubbers, which degrade the coating faster and expose underlying materials. Replace the pan if the nonstick surface chips, peels, or visibly degrades. Hand wash only; dishwasher cycles accelerate coating breakdown. Do not use for broiling or under direct flame.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Aroma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Cookware

Heritage Steel Fry Pan 8.5"

Heritage Steel

Fry Pan 8.5"

Clad stainless steel, no coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent
⚠️

Metal ion release (nickel, chromium) from stainless steel

Limited concern

70

Uncoated stainless steel, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Starting grade for this product type

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Made In

Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent
🍂

Clad separation or delamination over time

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Starting grade for this product type

Made In Stainless Clad Frying Pan Set 3-Piece Professional-Grade 5-Layer Metal Construction

Made In

Stainless Clad Frying Pan Set 3-Piece Professional-Grade 5-Layer Metal Construction

Stainless steel cladding, bare cooking surface

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Handle hardware or rivets (non-stainless components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock or handle detachment

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Starting grade for this product type

More cookware grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.