SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf vs Revolution 360 Synthetic Turf System: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
AstroTurf
SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive
LikelyPolypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding
ReportedBacking adhesive failure and fiber separation
FieldTurf
Revolution 360 Synthetic Turf System
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyMicroplastic shedding from fibers
PossibleInfill composition unknown or undisclosed
PossibleOff-gassing or VOC release (installation phase)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag VOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive, Polypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding, Backing adhesive failure and fiber separation and Infill contamination (if rubber granules used) on the AstroTurf and not on the FieldTurf.
- We flag Microplastic shedding from fibers, Infill composition unknown or undisclosed, Off-gassing or VOC release (installation phase) and Fiber degradation and heat sensitivity on the FieldTurf and not on the AstroTurf.
- The AstroTurf is Polypropylene (PP) astroturf where the FieldTurf is polyethylene fibers, infill, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the FieldTurf grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More artificial turf, see the full ranking