Miracle Volume Conditioner vs Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner: which is safer?

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Aussie Miracle Volume Conditioner

Aussie

Miracle Volume Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 67/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

water-based conditioner, polymeric conditioning agents

Confidence

72%

PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers

PossiblePolymeric conditioning agent buildup

Our pick

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts

Confidence

72%

PossibleHeavy metals in plant-derived ingredients

PossibleFragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers

PossibleSilicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fragrance allergens and sensitizers and Polymeric conditioning agent buildup on the Aussie and not on the Avalon Organics.
  • We flag Heavy metals in plant-derived ingredients, Fragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers and Silicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair on the Avalon Organics and not on the Aussie.
  • The Aussie is water-based conditioner, polymeric conditioning agents where the Avalon Organics is Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More conditioner, see the full ranking