Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner vs Volume & Fullness Conditioner: which is safer?

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts

Confidence

72%

PossibleHeavy metals in plant-derived ingredients

PossibleFragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers

PossibleSilicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair

Dove Volume & Fullness Conditioner

Dove

Volume & Fullness Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous conditioner with silicones, emulsifiers, surfactants

Confidence

72%

Possible1,4-dioxane (TDMH impurity)

PossibleFragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

ReportedSilicone buildup on hair and scalp

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Heavy metals in plant-derived ingredients, Fragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers and Silicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair on the Avalon Organics and not on the Dove.
  • We flag 1,4-dioxane (TDMH impurity), Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components) and Silicone buildup on hair and scalp on the Dove and not on the Avalon Organics.
  • The Avalon Organics is Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts where the Dove is aqueous conditioner with silicones, emulsifiers, surfactants, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More conditioner, see the full ranking