Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Sulfate Free Cleansing Cream Shampoo 13.5 Fl Oz: which is safer?
Cantu Sulfate Free Cleansing Cream Shampoo 13.5 Fl Oz is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Aveeno
Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 63/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water)
Confidence
82%
PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)
Our pick
Cantu
Sulfate Free Cleansing Cream Shampoo 13.5 Fl Oz
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Water-based cream shampoo formulation; packaging container
Confidence
72%
Possible1,4-Dioxane (secondary contaminant)
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Cantu.
- We flag 1,4-Dioxane (secondary contaminant) and Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Cantu and not on the Aveeno.
- The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Cantu is Water-based cream shampoo formulation; packaging container, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More shampoo, see the full ranking