Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Nutritive Bain Satin Riche Shampoo 8.5 oz: which is safer?

Kerastase Nutritive Bain Satin Riche Shampoo 8.5 oz is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

Aveeno

Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)

Our pick

Kerastase Nutritive Bain Satin Riche Shampoo 8.5 oz

Kerastase

Nutritive Bain Satin Riche Shampoo 8.5 oz

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 67/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

aqueous shampoo base (water, surfactants, conditioning agents)

Confidence

75%

PossibleFragrance allergens

Possible1,4-dioxane contamination

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact) and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Kerastase.
  • We flag 1,4-dioxane contamination on the Kerastase and not on the Aveeno.
  • Both carry a flag for Fragrance allergens, so neither choice avoids it.
  • The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Kerastase is aqueous shampoo base (water, surfactants, conditioning agents), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More shampoo, see the full ranking