Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Charcoal Dog Shampoo: which is safer?
Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Aveeno
Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)
Kin+Kind
Charcoal Dog Shampoo
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possible1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
PossiblePreservative contamination and microbial growth
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Kin+Kind.
- We flag 1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct), Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components, Preservative contamination and microbial growth and Skin irritation from charcoal particles or abrasives on the Kin+Kind and not on the Aveeno.
- The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Kin+Kind is Water-based liquid shampoo with charcoal, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More shampoo, see the full ranking