Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Natural Pet Shampoo and Conditioner for Itchy Dogs and Cats: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

Aveeno

Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)

kin+kind Natural Pet Shampoo and Conditioner for Itchy Dogs and Cats

Kin+Kind

Natural Pet Shampoo and Conditioner for Itchy Dogs and Cats

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

water-based liquid shampoo/conditioner formula

Confidence

72%

PossiblePreservative allergens and irritants

PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers

PossibleSurfactant residue and skin barrier disruption

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Kin+Kind.
  • We flag Preservative allergens and irritants, Fragrance allergens and sensitizers and Surfactant residue and skin barrier disruption on the Kin+Kind and not on the Aveeno.
  • The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Kin+Kind is water-based liquid shampoo/conditioner formula, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More shampoo, see the full ranking