Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Plant-Powered Shampoo Puracy Citrus & Mint / Refill (Pack of 2): which is safer?

Plant-Powered Shampoo Puracy Citrus & Mint / Refill (Pack of 2) is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

Aveeno

Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)

Our pick

Plant-Powered Shampoo Puracy Citrus & Mint / Refill (Pack of 2)

Puracy

Plant-Powered Shampoo Puracy Citrus & Mint / Refill (Pack of 2)

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 67/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

water-based plant-derived liquid shampoo concentrate

Confidence

78%

PossibleFragrance allergens (citrus oil, mint extract)

PossibleContainer leachables (BPA, BPS) from plastic packaging

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Puracy.
  • We flag Fragrance allergens (citrus oil, mint extract) and Container leachables (BPA, BPS) from plastic packaging on the Puracy and not on the Aveeno.
  • The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Puracy is water-based plant-derived liquid shampoo concentrate, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More shampoo, see the full ranking