Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Color Extend Magnetics Shampoo: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Aveeno
Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)
Redken
Color Extend Magnetics Shampoo
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
PossibleSilicone and polymer buildup on hair
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination from surfactant manufacturing
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Redken.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components, Silicone and polymer buildup on hair and 1,4-dioxane contamination from surfactant manufacturing on the Redken and not on the Aveeno.
- The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Redken is aqueous shampoo base with silicones, polymers, surfactants, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More shampoo, see the full ranking