UV Haze 010 Filter vs 67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. 67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera
PFAS grade
Good 50/100
Overall grade
Poor 34/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
Glass lens, metal frame, unspecified optical coatings
Confidence
35%
PossibleUnspecified optical coating composition
PossibleCoating degradation and particulate release
PossibleMetal frame leaching (aluminum or brass)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Unspecified optical coating composition, Coating degradation and particulate release, Metal frame leaching (aluminum or brass) and Glass integrity and cutting risk on the and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the is Glass lens, metal frame, unspecified optical coatings, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking