UV Haze 010 Filter vs Standard Coated Filter 5.65 x 5.65": which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Tiffen Standard Coated Filter 5.65 x 5.65" carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
Tiffen
Standard Coated Filter 5.65 x 5.65"
PFAS grade
Good 50/100
Overall grade
Poor 42/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
optical glass with unspecified coating
Confidence
35%
PossibleCoating chemical composition (unknown PFAS potential)
PossibleOptical glass dust (if filter breaks)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Coating chemical composition (unknown PFAS potential) and Optical glass dust (if filter breaks) on the Tiffen and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Tiffen is optical glass with unspecified coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Tiffen grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking