PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall42/ 100Poor
Tiffen Standard Coated Filter 5.65 x 5.65"

Tiffen · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Tiffen Standard Coated Filter 5.65 x 5.65"

Good

Unknown coating composition. Tiffen does not disclose PFAS status.

Verdict · SkipOptical glass filter with minimal established health hazards; PFAS coating composition unknown but not a primary exposure route for camera accessories.

This standard filter has unspecified optical glass and coating. No publicly documented coating composition exists for PFAS content assessment.

The better-graded swap

AquaTech Sport Housing Cover

Aquatech

AquaTech Sport Housing Cover

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

optical glass with unspecified coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Tiffen does not disclose whether the unspecified anti-reflective coating contains Teflon-family coating or other PFAS compounds. Optical coatings are not a significant inhalation or ingestion route for users, but environmental disposal risk exists if coating contains PFAS.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Optical glass dust (if filter breaks)

If the filter is dropped and shatters, fine glass particles pose a minor risk of eye or skin irritation during cleanup. This is a mechanical, not chemical, hazard and applies to any glass optical product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Lens coating separation or degradation

No documented cases of premature coating failure in Tiffen Standard Coated filters. Improper cleaning or storage may accelerate degradation, but this is a physical failure mode, not a chemical hazard.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Standard optical glass and metal oxide coatings (common in this product class) do not contain added lead, cadmium, or other restricted heavy metals. No published analysis or recalls suggest contamination.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-gassing

Optical filters are not a documented source of VOC emissions during normal use. Coatings are cured during manufacturing and do not off-gas under ambient storage or photographic conditions.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Tiffen Standard Coated filters are optical glass substrates with proprietary anti-reflective coatings applied to reduce lens flare and improve light transmission. The glass itself (silica-based) is inert and poses no leaching risk. The coating composition is not publicly disclosed by Tiffen, which prevents full chemical assessment; typical optical coatings use metal oxides (magnesium fluoride, titanium dioxide) that are not materials linked to PFAS, but some manufacturers have historically used Teflon-family coating (Teflon-type coating-related compounds) for improved durability.

The brand's record and disclosure

Tiffen is a long-established optical filter manufacturer with no known product recalls related to chemical safety or coating degradation. The company does not publicly disclose PFAS use in coatings or provide Material Safety Data Sheets for finished filters. Tiffen has not pursued third-party chemical certifications (such as environmental or toxicity standards) for this product line, which is typical for camera accessories but limits transparency.

How it compares in its category

Camera filters are not regulated as consumer products by the FDA or EPA in the United States; they fall outside food-contact and drinking-water product oversight. Tiffen's Standard Coated line represents mid-range optical quality; competitors include Hoya, B+W, and Kenko, most of which also do not disclose coating chemistry publicly. The optical glass substrate and coating durability are competitive with equivalents; no category-wide safety issues are documented.

If you buy it

Filters are typically not ingested or heated and present minimal dermal contact; standard handling poses no identified risk. Store in a dry environment to prevent coating separation or fungal growth on the internal surfaces. Inspect periodically for scratches, internal haze, or separation of the coating layers (signs of degradation); if visible damage occurs, replace the filter. Clean only with lens-grade cloths and solutions; avoid abrasive materials that may damage the coating.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tiffen has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.