UV Haze 010 Filter vs Eylar Standard 16" Gear Equipment Hard Camera Case Waterproof with Foam: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
Eylar Standard 16" Gear Equipment Hard Camera Case Waterproof with Foam
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Plastic hard case and foam interior
Confidence
35%
PossibleFoam off-gassing or microparticle shedding
PossibleMold or bacterial growth from moisture retention
PossibleVolatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing from plastic or foam
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Foam off-gassing or microparticle shedding, Mold or bacterial growth from moisture retention and Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing from plastic or foam on the and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the is Plastic hard case and foam interior, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking