UV Haze 010 Filter vs Waterproof Thermal Camera Case for FLIR C8, C5, C3 & C2: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
Waterproof Thermal Camera Case for FLIR C8, C5, C3 & C2
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 63/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
Unspecified synthetic case material
Confidence
35%
PossiblePolymer additive profile (unspecified)
PossibleInterior lining material composition
ReportedSeal degradation and water ingress
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Polymer additive profile (unspecified), Interior lining material composition, Seal degradation and water ingress and Microplastic shedding from wear on the and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the is Unspecified synthetic case material, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking