Incontinence Pads vs Suprem Form Maxi 2920ml: which is safer?
Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 66/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
Confidence
78%
PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials
Lille
Suprem Form Maxi 2920ml
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 58/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
cellulose-based absorbent core, plastic backing
Confidence
72%
PossiblePlastic backing additives (BPA, phthalates, other plasticizers)
PossibleFragrance or adhesive allergens
PossibleSkin irritation from non-woven layer or adhesive
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Lille.
- We flag Plastic backing additives (BPA, phthalates, other plasticizers), Fragrance or adhesive allergens and Skin irritation from non-woven layer or adhesive on the Lille and not on the Eco By Naty.
- The Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core where the Lille is cellulose-based absorbent core, plastic backing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking