Incontinence Pads vs Sure Care Bladder Control Pads Unisex Heavy Absorbency: which is safer?

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. SureCare Sure Care Bladder Control Pads Unisex Heavy Absorbency carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 66/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core

Confidence

78%

PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials

SureCare Sure Care Bladder Control Pads Unisex Heavy Absorbency

Surecare

Sure Care Bladder Control Pads Unisex Heavy Absorbency

PFAS grade

Poor 25/100

Overall grade

Bad 17/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Absorbent core with unspecified waterproof barrier layer

Confidence

45%

PossibleWaterproof barrier leachables (non-PFAS polymers and additives)

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from degraded polymer barrier

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Surecare.
  • We flag Waterproof barrier leachables (non-PFAS polymers and additives) and Microplastic shedding from degraded polymer barrier on the Surecare and not on the Eco By Naty.
  • The Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core where the Surecare is Absorbent core with unspecified waterproof barrier layer, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Surecare grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking