Incontinence Pads vs ProSkin Overnight Incontinence Pads: which is safer?
Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. TENA ProSkin Overnight Incontinence Pads carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 66/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
Confidence
78%
PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials
Tena
ProSkin Overnight Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Poor 25/100
Overall grade
Bad 3/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
absorbent core, superabsorbent polymer, waterproof backing layer
Confidence
35%
LikelyPFAS in waterproof backing layer
PossibleSkin irritation from adhesive or coating residues
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Tena.
- We flag PFAS in waterproof backing layer and Skin irritation from adhesive or coating residues on the Tena and not on the Eco By Naty.
- The Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core where the Tena is absorbent core, superabsorbent polymer, waterproof backing layer, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Tena grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking