Incontinence Pads vs ProSkin Ultimate Bladder Control Pad: which is safer?
Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. TENA ProSkin Ultimate Bladder Control Pad carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials
Tena
ProSkin Ultimate Bladder Control Pad
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePFAS in waterproof backing (graded separately by your PFAS methodology)
ReportedSkin irritation from synthetic backing or degradation byproducts
PossibleMicroplastics from backing degradation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Tena.
- We flag PFAS in waterproof backing (graded separately by your PFAS methodology), Skin irritation from synthetic backing or degradation byproducts and Microplastics from backing degradation on the Tena and not on the Eco By Naty.
- The Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core where the Tena is Cellulose-based absorbent core, polyester, waterproof backing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Tena grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking