Men's Italian-Stretch Chino Pant vs Ralph Lauren Men's Jarrett Slim Fit Sateen Pant: which is safer?
Ralph Lauren Men's Jarrett Slim Fit Sateen Pant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Banana Republic
Men's Italian-Stretch Chino Pant
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dye contamination and allergic sensitization
ReportedMicroplastic shedding from elastane
Our pick
Polo Ralph Lauren
Ralph Lauren Men's Jarrett Slim Fit Sateen Pant
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and colorant toxicity
PossibleResidual dye or sizing chemicals (skin irritation risk)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dye contamination and allergic sensitization and Microplastic shedding from elastane on the Banana Republic and not on the Polo Ralph Lauren.
- We flag Azo dyes and colorant toxicity and Residual dye or sizing chemicals (skin irritation risk) on the Polo Ralph Lauren and not on the Banana Republic.
- The Banana Republic is cotton-elastane blend, no known durable water repellent finish where the Polo Ralph Lauren is 100% cotton sateen weave, no surface treatment disclosed, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More wrinkle-free professional workwear, see the full ranking