PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
Ralph Lauren Men's Jarrett Slim Fit Sateen Pant

Polo Ralph Lauren · Wrinkle-Free Professional Workwear

Ralph Lauren Men's Jarrett Slim Fit Sateen Pant

Good

Lower concern; bare cotton sateen without waterproofing claimed.

Verdict · Skip100% cotton sateen with no chemical finishes reported; PFAS low-risk; standard textile hazards at baseline industry levels.

Plain cotton sateen with no water-resistant or stain-resistant finish disclosed. No evidence of PFAS treatment signals based on standard product descriptions.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

100% cotton sateen weave, no surface treatment disclosed

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Ralph Lauren Men's Jarrett Fit Sateen Pant is made of, ingredients and materials

This pant is 100% cotton in a sateen weave, which means the yarns are twisted and woven to create a smooth, lustrous surface without relying on chemical coatings or resin finishes. Cotton sateen is inherently lower-risk than synthetic blends or treated fabrics because it avoids the polymer-based finishes that often carry formaldehyde releasers or antimony catalysts. The absence of disclosed wrinkle-resistant or water-resistant treatments means no durable press chemicals (typically formaldehyde-based) are suspected in this particular garment.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and colorant toxicity

Polo Ralph Lauren does not publicly certify dye sources or test for restricted azo dyes. Standard textile dyeing in this price range may include azo colorants, though azo dye-linked health incidents in apparel are rare and primarily occupational (for dyers, not wearers).

70/ 100
🎨

Residual dye or sizing chemicals (skin irritation risk)

New cotton textiles may retain small amounts of sizing starch, dyes, or processing oils that can irritate sensitive skin. A single pre-wash removes most residue; this is standard practice for any new garment.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No wrinkle-resistant or durable-press finish is disclosed on this product. 100% cotton sateen without chemical treatment reported means formaldehyde-releasing resins are not expected; none on record for this specific garment.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Antimony in synthetic components

This product is 100% cotton sateen with no polyester or synthetic fiber disclosed, so antimony catalysts used in polyester production are not a concern here.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

No flame retardant treatment is disclosed or typical for cotton dress pants in this category. Flame retardants are not expected unless the garment is labeled as flame-resistant.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Polo Ralph Lauren does not publicly disclose fiber sourcing, chemical finish specifications, or certifications such as OEKO-TEX or GOTS for most of its mainline products. The brand has not faced major recalls or public scandals tied to formaldehyde or azo dyes in workwear lines, but their transparency on textile chemical use is minimal compared to competitors. No independent third-party testing results specific to this model are on record in public databases.

How it compares in its category

Wrinkle-free professional workwear typically relies on polyester-cotton blends with formaldehyde-releasing finishes or 100% synthetic alternatives treated with chemical resins. This all-cotton sateen pant avoids those synthetic additives altogether, positioning it lower-risk than most competitors in the category. The trade-off is that all-cotton sateen may wrinkle more readily than treated alternatives, requiring more frequent pressing or laundering.

If you buy it

Launder in warm water and tumble dry on low to medium heat to minimize shrinkage and fiber stress; avoid high heat, which can degrade cellulose over time. No special chemical sensitivity is expected, but pre-wash once to remove any residual dyes or finishes applied during manufacturing. Replace the pant if seams begin to fray, fabric pills excessively, or color fades unevenly, as these may indicate accelerated aging rather than chemical degradation.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Polo Ralph Lauren has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More wrinkle-free professional workwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.