bareMinerals Mineral Makeup vs For Men Moisturizing Face Lotion: which is safer?
bareMinerals Mineral Makeup is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Bare Minerals
bareMinerals Mineral Makeup
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleHeavy metals in mineral pigments (lead, cadmium, chromium)
PossibleFragrance allergens and skin irritation
PossibleBismuth oxychloride sensitivity
Clinique
For Men Moisturizing Face Lotion
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFormaldehyde releasers in preservative system
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
Possible1,4-dioxane as manufacturing byproduct
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in mineral pigments (lead, cadmium, chromium), Fragrance allergens and skin irritation and Bismuth oxychloride sensitivity on the Bare Minerals and not on the Clinique.
- We flag Formaldehyde releasers in preservative system, Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components and 1,4-dioxane as manufacturing byproduct on the Clinique and not on the Bare Minerals.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Bare Minerals is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Clinique grade, at 72% confidence against 100%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cosmetics, see the full ranking