bareMinerals Mineral Makeup vs Extensionist Washable Mascara: which is safer?

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup is the clear pick. L'Oréal Paris Extensionist Washable Mascara carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

Bare Minerals

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

not stated

Confidence

100%

PossibleHeavy metals in mineral pigments (lead, cadmium, chromium)

PossibleFragrance allergens and skin irritation

PossibleBismuth oxychloride sensitivity

L'Oréal Paris Extensionist Washable Mascara

L'Oréal Paris

Extensionist Washable Mascara

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 43/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

typical mascara wax, film-forming polymers, pigments

Confidence

35%

PossibleHeavy metals in pigments

ReportedPreservative allergens and irritants

PossibleFragrance constituents and undisclosed components

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Heavy metals in mineral pigments (lead, cadmium, chromium), Fragrance allergens and skin irritation and Bismuth oxychloride sensitivity on the Bare Minerals and not on the L'Oréal Paris.
  • We flag Heavy metals in pigments, Preservative allergens and irritants, Fragrance constituents and undisclosed components and Microplastic fibers in formula on the L'Oréal Paris and not on the Bare Minerals.
  • The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Bare Minerals is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the L'Oréal Paris grade, at 35% confidence against 100%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cosmetics, see the full ranking