Fitness Tracker with Bluetooth Calls vs Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch: which is safer?
Fitness Tracker with Bluetooth Calls is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Fitness Tracker with Bluetooth Calls
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 63/100
Verdict
Buy with care
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
Electronics housing, elastomer band
Confidence
35%
PossibleElastomer band degradation and skin sensitization
PossibleFlame retardant additives in housing plastic
ReportedBattery and internal component leakage
X-Doria
Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel, magnetic closure
Confidence
82%
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Elastomer band degradation and skin sensitization, Flame retardant additives in housing plastic, Battery and internal component leakage and Microplastics from elastomer wear on the and not on the X-Doria.
- We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the .
- The is Electronics housing, elastomer band where the X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking