BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss vs Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick: which is safer?
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Becca Cosmetics
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
Charlotte Tilbury
Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients)
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination (from surfactants or ethoxylated ingredients)
PossibleMica and talc contaminants (if present in pigment blend)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the Charlotte Tilbury.
- We flag Fragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients), 1,4-dioxane contamination (from surfactants or ethoxylated ingredients) and Mica and talc contaminants (if present in pigment blend) on the Charlotte Tilbury and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
- The Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss) where the Charlotte Tilbury is Wax, oils, pigments, silicones, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick, see the full ranking