PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick

Charlotte Tilbury · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick

Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick

Excellent

Lower concern. Main material not linked to PFAS.

Verdict · BuyMatte Revolution is a standard wax-silicone lipstick with no documented heavy metal or formaldehyde issues; lower PFAS load mitigates primary cosmetic risk.

Material as recorded includes wax, oils, pigments, and silicones. Charlotte Tilbury has no PFAS statement on record for this product. No lab data or certifications on record.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Wax, oils, pigments, silicones

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Charlotte Tilbury Matte Lipstick is made of, ingredients and materials

Matte Revolution is a silicone and wax-based lipstick with pigments and oils. The formula trades traditional emollients for silicones, which improve wear and matte finish but require scrutiny for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and fragrance allergens. Wax and silicone bases are chemically stable at room and skin temperature, so leaching of heavy metals from the formula itself is not a documented concern in this product class.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients)

Charlotte Tilbury lipsticks list 'fragrance' as a single ingredient. This obscures specific allergens such as limonene, linalool, or eugenol that can trigger contact dermatitis. Individual sensitivity varies; fragrance-sensitive users report irritation, but no product-specific adverse events are documented.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination (from surfactants or ethoxylated ingredients)

If this formula uses ethoxylated emulsifiers or PEG compounds, 1,4-dioxane may be a trace impurity. Charlotte Tilbury does not disclose surfactant sources or test results. Risk is low in anhydrous formulas but cannot be ruled out without third-party testing.

70/ 100
🎨

Mica and talc contaminants (if present in pigment blend)

Some prestige lipsticks use talc or mica for slip and finish. If talc is present, asbestos contamination is unlikely in modern cosmetics but historically documented in the ingredient class. Charlotte Tilbury does not specify talc absence; matte texture suggests possible use, though silicones may substitute entirely.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No published recalls or testing data show lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in Matte Revolution. Silicone lipsticks with certified color additives (CI pigments) have low historical risk, though independent verification by the brand is absent.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Silicone and wax bases do not require formaldehyde as a preservative. No product-specific data or complaints suggest formaldehyde presence. This hazard is not typical for prestige anhydrous lipsticks.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Charlotte Tilbury does not publicly disclose full ingredient sourcing, heavy metal testing, or PFAS avoidance strategies. The brand has no documented recalls or regulatory actions on record for this product line. Marketing emphasizes luxury and performance rather than safety transparency, which is typical for prestige cosmetics but leaves consumers without third-party assurance of contaminant screening.

How it compares in its category

Matte Revolution sits in the mid-to-premium segment; its silicone-forward formula is standard for long-wear mattes and does not differ materially from competitors like MAC Fix+ or Urban Decay Vice. Most prestige lipsticks at this tier lack published heavy metal or allergen test results. Charlotte Tilbury's price point does not correlate with better disclosure than mass-market alternatives.

If you buy it

Store at room temperature away from direct sunlight to prevent silicone separation or pigment degradation. Replace annually or if you notice color shift, texture change, or separation of oils. Avoid applying to broken or irritated skin to reduce risk of fragrance irritation. Wash applicators weekly to prevent bacterial growth if shared.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Charlotte Tilbury has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.