BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss vs Dramatically Different Lipstick Shaping Lip Colour: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Becca Cosmetics
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 71/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
Clinique
Dramatically Different Lipstick Shaping Lip Colour
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 71/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
wax, oils, pigments, traditional cosmetic base
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the Clinique.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components on the Clinique and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
- The Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss) where the Clinique is wax, oils, pigments, traditional cosmetic base, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick, see the full ranking