BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss vs s Liquid Lip Smacker Lip Party Pack: which is safer?
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Becca Cosmetics
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 71/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
Lip Smacker
s Liquid Lip Smacker Lip Party Pack
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Poor 49/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 5
Material
liquid cosmetic formula, typical ingredients are glycerin, oils, waxes, colorants
Confidence
72%
Possible1,4-dioxane (solvent/contaminant)
PossibleFormaldehyde releasers (preservatives)
PossibleSynthetic colorants and heavy metal contamination
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the Lip Smacker.
- We flag 1,4-dioxane (solvent/contaminant), Formaldehyde releasers (preservatives), Synthetic colorants and heavy metal contamination and Fragrance allergens on the Lip Smacker and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
- The Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss) where the Lip Smacker is liquid cosmetic formula, typical ingredients are glycerin, oils, waxes, colorants, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick, see the full ranking