Lip Smacker · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick
Lip Smackers Liquid Lip Smacker Lip Party Pack
Lower concern cosmetic product with no PFAS red flags identified.
Lip Smackers liquid lipstick uses standard cosmetic ingredients with no known PFAS triggers like waterproofing coatings or Teflon-family coating. Brand makes no PFAS claims, but product category presents minimal risk.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
liquid cosmetic formula, typical ingredients are glycerin, oils, waxes, colorants
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Lip Smackers Liquid Lip Party Pack is made of, ingredients and materials
Lip Smacker liquid formulas are water and oil-based suspensions, typically built on glycerin, mineral oil, waxes, and synthetic colorants. These are high-volume commodity ingredients in cosmetics with long safety histories. The 'Liquid' variant replaces traditional solid balm with a pourable consistency, reducing physical degradation during storage but adding preservative demand to prevent microbial growth in the wetter matrix.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
1,4-dioxane (solvent/contaminant)
Liquid cosmetic formulas may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylation in emulsifiers or surfactants, depending on manufacturing. Lip Smacker does not publicly disclose this, and no independent testing of this product line is available; levels in mainstream lip products are typically below regulatory concern but not zero.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Liquid formulas require preservatives; Imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea (formaldehyde releasers) are permitted cosmetic preservatives sometimes found in lip products. Lip Smacker's ingredient list is not fully public, so actual use is unconfirmed; if present, levels are regulated but can trigger contact sensitivity in individuals with formaldehyde sensitivity.
Source, ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Lip Smacker liquid formulas use synthetic dyes (likely FD&C approved in the US) and iron oxides. Colorants can carry trace lead or cadmium from mining and refining; FDA color certification reduces but does not eliminate this risk. No product-specific testing is public.
Source, FDA ↗Fragrance allergens
Lip Smacker formulas contain added fragrance to create the signature sweet scent; fragrance is a known source of contact dermatitis and sensitization. This is standard in the brand's positioning but persons with fragrance sensitivity or atopic lips should avoid or patch-test first.
Microbial growth in liquid matrix
Liquid lip products are wetter than solid balms, increasing risk of mold or bacterial colonization if the bottle cap is damaged or left open. Proper storage and timely replacement mitigate this, but the format itself carries higher contamination risk than alternatives.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Lip Smacker (owned by Markwins International) maintains minimal public ingredient transparency and has published no independent safety certifications or third-party testing reports. No recalls or regulatory actions specific to this product line are on record. The brand does not publicly address heavy metals, allergens, or formaldehyde releasers, which is standard opacity for mass-market lip cosmetics but limits independent verification.
How it compares in its category
Lip Smacker occupies the budget mainstream tier; it uses conventional cosmetic colorants and preservatives rather than premium botanical or mineral-only formulas. Compared to prestige brands, disclosure is lower; compared to dollar-store alternatives, ingredient sourcing is more established. Safety profile sits at the permissible baseline for regulated cosmetics but offers no differentiation or premium safety claim.
If you buy it
Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to prevent preservative degradation and color separation. Replace every 12-18 months or if odor or texture changes occur, as liquid formulas are more susceptible to microbial colonization than solids if the cap is left loose. Perform a patch test on inner arm if prone to fragrance or dye sensitivity; discontinue if redness or itching develops. Ensure bottle cap seals completely after each use.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Lip Smacker has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.