BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss vs Mini Lipglass: which is safer?
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Becca Cosmetics
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 71/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
MAC
Mini Lipglass
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
liquid cosmetic gloss (oil/wax/silicone base)
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens (unspecified composition)
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination (manufacturing byproduct)
PossibleSilicone accumulation on lip barrier
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the MAC.
- We flag Fragrance allergens (unspecified composition), 1,4-dioxane contamination (manufacturing byproduct), Silicone accumulation on lip barrier and Bacterial growth in applicator wand (user-storage dependent) on the MAC and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
- The Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss) where the MAC is liquid cosmetic gloss (oil/wax/silicone base), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick, see the full ranking